HomeNewsArticle Display

Man vs. Machine: testing Pilot-directed Airdrop in a C-17

An aircrew performs preflight checks before flying a mission July 18, 2018, to test the ability to perform a Pilot-Directed Airdrop in a C-17 Globemaster III.

An aircrew performs preflight checks before flying a mission July 18, 2018, to test the ability to perform a Pilot-Directed Airdrop in a C-17 Globemaster III. For the tests, the aircrew included an additional crewmember who was responsible for initiating the airdrop instead of the onboard computer. the purpose of the test mission was to conclude the effectiveness of having an aircrew conduct an airdrop using visual cues in situations where the aircraft is operating with a degraded or complete loss of primary navigation computer guidance.

Capt. Nicholas Krause, 8th Airlift Squadron, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., goes over a map during a mission-planning meeting here July 19, 2018, in order to identify the visual cues used to perform a Pilot-Directed Airdrop.

Capt. Nicholas Krause, 8th Airlift Squadron, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., goes over a map during a mission-planning meeting here July 19, 2018, in order to identify the visual cues used to perform a Pilot-Directed Airdrop. For PDAs, the C-17 includes an additional crewmember who is responsible for timing the airdrop based on visual cues on the ground. Given the speed and altitude of a C-17 during an airdrop, being even a second off on their release time could put the cargo about 85 yards from its intended location.

Capt. Tim Thackaberry, 16th Airlift Squadron pilot, goes over a mission plan July 19, 2018, prior to flying a sortie to test C-17 Pilot-Directed Airdrop capability.

Capt. Tim Thackaberry, 16th Airlift Squadron pilot, goes over a mission plan July 19, 2018, prior to flying a sortie to test C-17 Pilot-Directed Airdrop capability. During standard airdrop operations, if the aircraft computers are not functioning properly, the aircrew decides if they are going to take another pass and try to reboot the system or return without completing the airdrop. However, with PDA, if the system were not working, the right additional crewmember would replace the functions of the computer and assist the pilots in getting over the drop zone and successfully dropping the cargo.

Maj. William Carter, Air Mobility Command Test and Evaluation Squadron Pilot-Directed Airdrop test Test Director, conducts preflight planning July 19, 2018, with Capt. Nick Krause, a pilot from the 8th Airlift Squadron at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash.

Maj. William Carter, Air Mobility Command Test and Evaluation Squadron Pilot-Directed Airdrop test Test Director, conducts preflight planning July 19, 2018, with Capt. Nick Krause, a pilot from the 8th Airlift Squadron at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. The Pilot-Directed Airdrop capability test sorties measured the capability of an aircrew member to conduct an airdrop using visual cues in situations where the aircraft is operating with a degraded or complete loss of primary navigation computer guidance.

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, S.C. -- Test directors from the Air Mobility Command Test and Evaluation Squadron at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, conducted a capability evaluation of C-17 Globemaster III Pilot-Directed Airdrop tactics, techniques and procedures here July 9-20, supported by aircrews from Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina and Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington.

The test measured the capability of an aircrew member to conduct an airdrop using visual cues in situations where the aircraft is operating with a degraded or complete loss of primary navigation computer operations.

“The C-17 is designed as a two-person cockpit and for visual airdrop, they’re adding in a third person,” said Capt. Tiffany Szumila, one of two AMCTES PDA test directors. “The third person is the right additional crew member, or RACM, who is essentially becoming a navigator of sorts by using route study on the ground to identify visual points of certain distances that match up to a predefined time, based on a ground speed, in order to do a visual navigation to that point.”

During standard airdrop operations, if the aircraft computers are not functioning properly, the aircrew decides if they are going to take another pass and try to reboot the system, or return without completing the airdrop. This is determined by the threat level assigned to the mission.  However, with PDA, if the system were not working, the RACM would replace the functions of the computer and assist the pilots in getting over the drop zone and successfully dropping the cargo.

“All the timing cues we normally get from the mission computer are then solely the responsibility of the RACM,” said Capt. Nikolaus Krause, pilot from the 8th Airlift Squadron at JBLM. “From a minute out, that is all on the RACM to make sure the timing of the drop is happening and when it gets really critical is within five seconds, because if we’re even a second late, that's 85 yards off target for just that one second.”

The test evaluated two aspects of PDA: the accuracy of each drop, and the perceived workload of the pilot acting as the RACM.  The test team collected data based on where the RACM called for the drop in comparison to where the computer would have otherwise specified.  The metrics are based on actual aircraft position over the ground, removing post-release variables such as wind effects.

“The goal for the past two weeks has just been to see how accurate we can be within a predetermined boundary from the desired release point,” said Krause. “We're more concerned with how accurate we are in relation to our predetermined release point than we are necessarily with the material that’s dropped.”

To determine that accuracy, the test directors received printouts showing how closely the drops would have been to the drop point.  Over the next few weeks, the team will evaluate the data and report on the effectiveness of PDA, supporting AMC leaders in making a final fielding decision. 

A crucial aspect to any new tactic or procedure is the additional workload placed on the crewmembers and potential interference with other mission-essential tasks.  During the test, each pilot rated their workload on a 1 to 10 scale.  With the data from every pilot in every crew position, test directors are able to determine task distribution in the cockpit, especially with the addition of the new RACM crew position and duties.  Through comparison with pilot and co-pilot ratings over the test period, the test directors will evaluate the crew resource management, a critical facet of crew aircraft, and provide feedback to assist with optimizing the new tactics.

“After every airdrop, we ask them [test participants] what they perceive the workload to be.  Those are relative numbers and change by the person, but what we're trying to understand is how busy do they feel,” said Maj. William Carter, AMCTES PDA test director. “Do they feel like they can't do anything else if they’re doing this?  Do they have enough situational awareness to take care of all the other tasks they need to do while operating the aircraft and doing the airdrop mission?”

With all the tests now complete, the AMCTES team will publish a formal report on their findings helping to enhance the combat capability of the AMC fleet. 
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

315th AW on Facebook 315th AW on  Instagram 315th AW on Twitter 315th AW on YouTube 315th AW on Flickr Dvids Behind the Wing Podcast